In order to understand the situation of American blacks, we must not throw out earlier ways of conceiving American identity. Instead, we must adapt these conceptions and combine them with the psychology of victimization described in Wax’s book in order to understand the situation of American blacks. Additionally, we must consider institutions such as slavery and structural racism that have put blacks at a disadvantage while searching for equal opportunity in society. Although Wax cites that race-based discrimination accounts for a small portion of disparity, and advocates for reforming culture instead of utilizing government programs and structural changes, a mix of these approaches is essential in order to empower blacks and allow them to align with the modified view of American identity that is the “deconstructionist” identity introduced by Huntington in Who Are We?
Wax asserts that victimization by blacks has been a “defining part of group identity throughout our national history” (97). Further, Wax explains the distinction between the internal and external locus of control. A person with an external locus of control “tends to believe that his destiny is largely out of his hands. The most important forces in his life are bad luck or social impediments such as discrimination” (98). On the other hand, a person with an internal locus of control “regards his fate as largely a product of his own actions, decisions and choices. Such a person ignores or discounts external barriers” (98). Wax goes on to assert that some evidence shows that blacks tend to have more of an external locus than whites. Most of Wax’s argument is that blacks focus much more on external forces that are out of their control, hence the title of the chapter “The Psychology of Victimization”. Even though Wax has a well thought out argument, she fails to fully recognize that whites have had advantages over blacks and other minorities since the beginning of America. Although a shift to an internal locus of control would benefit all members of society, something like this will take time. Also, in order to have a national identity for all, it is essential for people to be more understanding of past institutions such as slavery that left blacks at a disadvantage. Additionally, we must draw back on the strong national identity that was largely created by whites in order to allow minority groups to align with an identity that is more accepting and full of other subnational identities.
Wax outlines the two approaches to improving the situation for blacks in America. The first is government programs and structural changes such as education and employment remedies. The second approach is “an inner focus on reforming the culture and altering individual values and behaviors” (95). Wax argues that the government programs and structural changes have outlived their usefulness, and we must look toward reforming culture and altering individual values and cultures. Additionally, Wax argues that many people turn to blame race-based discrimination for many issues in society, yet this “explains a very small part of existing differences in educational attainment, jobs, wages, family structure, consumer credit rates, and involvement with the criminal justice system”(95). Although Wax argues that an approach utilizing both structural changes and cultural changes has proved to be futile, it is still necessary. Drawing back on government programs would make the situation for blacks even worse. Although cultural change is a novel idea, it seems unattainable and also does not contribute to a deconstructionist identity. We must be accepting of culture, instead of changing it. Continuing government programs as well as promoting an internal locus of control will allow for improvements for both blacks and society as a whole.
In order to understand the situation of blacks, we must adapt the Anglo-Protestant view of identity, and create a more deconstructionist identity. As pointed out by Huntington in Who Are We?, “in the 1960s and 1970s they began to promote measures consciously designed to weaken America’s cultural and creedal identity and to strengthen racial, ethnic, cultural, and other subnational identities” (Huntington 143). Continuing to adapt a deconstructionist identity and developing a sense of empathy for past hardships will allow blacks and other minorities to be empowered and improve their condition. Overall, it is seemingly impossible to change a culture, but with a combination of government programs, a deconstructionist identity, empathy, and a promotion of the internal locus of control, we can better understand the situation of American blacks and help American blacks rise above disparity.