We Wanted Workers Introduction Reflection
Throughout the introduction of We Wanted Workers, Borjas brings up many interesting points. One that stood out was his discussion of points made by Paul Collier, a professor at Oxford University. Collier asserts: “A rabid collection of xenophobes and racists who are hostile to immigrants lose no opportunity to argue that migration is bad for indigenous populations. Understandably, this has triggered a reaction: desperate not to give succor to these groups, social scientists have strained every muscle to show that migration is good for everyone” (21). Borjas proceeds to assert that this is a damaging statement to social science research, but he has suspected for a long time that much research was ideologically motivated, and “censored or filtered to spin the evidence in a way that would exaggerate the benefits from immigration and downplay the costs” (21). This is a question I have found myself asking before as I try to be very skeptical when reading assertions that are not backed by clear cut data. Borjas further asserts that We Wanted Workers “will provide various examples in which arbitrary conceptual assumptions, questionable data manipulations, and a tendency to overlook inconvenient facts help build the not-so-subtle narrative that Collier detected” (23). I think all of social science and all research in general should seek to pursue research in the way that Borjas does, by looking at the facts, instead of building research off of ideological obligations.