Categories
Reading and Film Presentations and Discussion

“Origin of the Anglo-Americans…” ERA

Tocqueville illustrates in chapter two, “Origin of the Anglo-Americans, and the Importance of this Origin in Relation to their Future Condition,” the way in which the origins of the United States, more specifically, New England, allows us to understand and examine the production of equality and freedom in government and social conditions. He finds it necessary to see the roots and foundation of both equality and freedom in society to be able to accurately analyze their growth and overarching meaning. The United States is the only country in which you are able to so closely examine the society’s natural growth and see the distinguishable influence which permitted the origin of future conditions. He clarifies the difference between the development of the south versus the North. The south predominantly formed as the people seeked riches, such as gold and silver in Virginia, and the later artisans and agriculturist alongside the development of slavery there, which brought about weak morals to the future character and laws of the future south. In contrast, New Englanders predominantly came due to their intellectual yearning, promoting “elements of order and morality.” Northerners were, therefore, more intellectual and able to create more progressive laws and social values which were able to construct the later values of freedom in law and society. 

Additionally, Tocqueville illuminates the impact of religious freedom on the makeup of morals and government in the United States. Many sectarians came to America as a result of the yearning for a lack of combination of government and religion, resulting in a majority of middle-class citizens that came. This desire arose a yearning for religious freedom in the new world, and Tocqueville emphasizes how people searched for “ heaven in the world beyond, and well-being and liberty in this one.” People sacrificed everything for this desired notion, which further shaped the great value of freedom. 

Categories
Catch-All/Student Discussion Questions

Social Status’ Affect on Human Growth

Tocqueville highlights in “Democracy in America” how humans are distinguished from “brutes” as they strive to improve and differentiate as well as heighten their social status. Although, he does emphasizes how humans beings born into a social class or category influence their motivation to grow as human beings. He emphasizes how people begin to define themselves based on the social status they presume themselves and others to have. This may lead to someone who is born into a lower social class being discouraged to advance in society and as a person as they are influenced by society; therefore Tocqueville finds that removing a system of class and social status as a norm allows humans to further grow as they would be less restricted and less influenced by societal norms and social standings. I find that Tocqueville would agree with the removing of gifted programs in New York City as discussed in “Desegregation Plan: Eliminate All Gifted Programs in New York” as it may prevent the growth of the minorities who are being categorized at a young age, which he would find to be restrictive and preventative of growth. Although, in contrast, I find that humans not seeing from a beginning stage that they are at a disadvantage may make them feel discouraged as they could potentially place the blame on themselves which could potentially lead them to be less motivated.