In this section of Races, Wrongs and Remedies, The author of this book drives the idea that for African American culture to seek equality, there must be a change in the cultures prospective and their society must be altered. She drives the point with proof by speaking of African American families. She says that with poor family connection and definition, it’s hard for children to grow up with the proper goals set for the cultural desire of equality. The author also argues that an even playing field is not enough to reach equality. What is the the real truth in finding pure equality to the point where everyone is satisfied? Is satisfaction rationally reachable? Do the authors points pave the way toward equality in society?
Author: Brian Brown
The Anglo-American Protestant culture, described by Samuel Huntington, is built on two main ideas: individual responsibility and work ethic. Anglo-Protestants take more pride in their work and are able to be individually responsible for themselves. They are so motivated to work and try hard because if they do, they will be a good Christian. John Grady Cole, in All the Pretty Horses, is portrayed as a boy who has prematurely aged, who values intelligence, justice, responsibility, and skill. John Grady Cole represents a worldview that relates to the Anglo-Protestant cultural worldview described by Samuel Huntington by emphasizing individual responsibility throughout his journey.
John Grady Cole represents individual responsibility, like the Anglo-Protestants by migrating as a cowboy with only friends to the Mexican border, wanting to live the legacy of his grandfather. They face a lot of adversity and lose connection from one another, allowing Grady to show off his responsible nature. Grady is clearly more individually responsible than Blevins. Since Blevins was afraid of lightning, he hid in a ditch and couldn’t be individually responsible for his own horse and fear. When Rawlins and Grady were being tortured and interrogated, it was Rawlins who made the false confession– falsely turning themselves in to go to prison. While living in a very dangerous and violent prison, John Grady Cole was able to stand up against a wealthy prisoner asking to be bribed. He was just being individually responsible for his cowboy culture, refusing to ally him. This caused him to become a target and under attack. During the attack, he is able to physically fight for himself, coming out injured but victorious. He’s sent to the infirmary and then get’s let out of the prison before completely healing. He then has to be individually responsible for his health, his culture and problems. He is trying to win Alejandra over, so John Grady Cole’s maturity and individual responsibility illuminates throughout the journey, preparing for his future with a lady. He finds out that Alejandra can’t leave her family for him, so he keeps a strong connection with his own culture as a cowboy, retrieving his horses. He then crosses back into Texas, finding out that he does not have a home, a father, a ranch or friends.
The death of John Grady Cole’s grandfather ignited the journey for John which is a symbol for his maturity and individual responsibility. His mother wants to sell the ranch, so it is now his responsibility to keep the family culture alive. A lot of weight was put on his shoulders after his loss, and he handled it as an Anglo-Protestant would. He made many responsible decisions through difficult circumstances. He made individual decisions that he knew were justified and proper. When he didn’t, like when he confessed of killing a man, he was backed up and told that sometimes those sorts of things must be done. His journey made him grow exponentially as a responsible individual, highlighting one of the key aspects of Anglo-Protestant culture. He kept pursuing through adversity and watching out for himself– everything an Anglo-Protestant would want to be a good Christian.
A lot of interesting events occur in this section of the book as Rawlins and Grady are moved to another prison. They are violently attacked from the day they arrive, understanding that it is not a safe place to be. The fight for survival during their time in the new prison. After the other prisoners realize they don’t have money to bribe with, Rawlins and Grady lose connection with one another as Rawlins gets knifed. Grady, surviving by himself, uses the last of his money to buy a knife to protect himself because he knows an attack is coming because he Grady will not bribe. The attack does come and Grady comes out injured but victorious. He collapses from the injury and is taken to the infirmary. After he heals, Alejandras great aunt had paid for his and Rawlins release from the prison. They both agree that Rawlins will head back to Texas and Grady will stay in Mexico to fight for their horses again.
McCarthy portrays Mexico and it’s culture through the actions of Perez– the prisoner who is expecting a bribe or will attack Grady. Perez, as a representative for the Mexican culture, he shows how the morally-guided people are set to fail and that violence leads to survival while morals and peace leads to death. Perez thinks that Americans only view things as they want, not how they are. Even though both Rawlins and Grady get injured, and Blevins dies and the prison is very dangerous, they still prove that living life with good morals doesn’t lead to death, as they were able to be released.
What can we learn from the relationship between Perez and Americans? Why is the new prison so dangerous and violent especially against Americans? What can we take from this?
There were six hundred and twenty thousand deaths over the fight of slavery. There are a total of 1.2 million deaths from all wars combined. The Civil War was the most deadly war the United States has ever been in. Believe it or not, there is a benefit that had come from all of the deaths from the war. Lives were taken, yet they provided proof that patriotism is real. The war had labeled the country as united as one and not as many. A national consciousness rose post-war and our national identity was more defined than ever before. But the one thing that stands out to me and scares me is that the level of change in some patriotic practices. Pre-civil war, national history was unimportant and only 6 states required teaching of national history in public schools. It’s scary because that allows room for loss of knowledge, which may make all of the information that we know about the nations history before 1860s inaccurate.
Without the Civil War we may not know as much as we do now from our history. The beauty of it is not the hundreds of thousands of deaths, but the patriotism that was ignited and the love and the studying for our country. Those people took their lives and fought for our country for the benefit of a united nation.
The Witch
The movie The Witch was not particularly a scary movie, it was more of a slow burning creepy tale. There was a lot of suspicion, paranoia, panic and despair about the life of a farmer when his youngest son suddenly disappears. The family was expelled or exiled from the local area because of a religious dispute. Religion is the main pillar of identity in the 1630s so at the time, it had power to change lives. The family blames the eldest daughter for the youngest son’s disappearance since she was with him at that time. The family is being as rational as possible, when the truth is that a witch nearby kidnapped him. The witch kidnapped him because it allows the witch to become younger, so she can kidnap the oldest boy of the family later in the movie and kill him. The movie allows for people to understand how identity was shaped in the 1630s and what the repercussions could be if a puritan went against the word of God. The movie proves that faith and religion was the main factor for identification for the Puritans. It makes us ask questions today like could this situation happen contemporarily? Does religion still have as big of an impact on identity today? If not, then what makes us who we are today? What kind of altercation could trigger solitude in this day and age?