In the novel All the Pretty Horses by Cormac McCarthy, the main protagonist John Grady Cole is a unique individual who craves action and adventure on his journey from Texas to Mexico. John Grady decided to leave his home and family after finding out the ranch he grew up on was being sold. His trip took him down an unexpected path involving stolen horses, prison and murders that showed John Grady’s grit and determination; additionally, along the way we see his strong work ethic that aligns with the Protestant work ethic that Samuel Huntington discusses in Who Are We?. John Grady Cole shows both similarities and differences with the values of the Anglo-Protestant cultural worldview according to Samuel Huntington, but he is more consistent with this worldview than not.
John Grady Cole’s distinctive individualism is shown throughout McCarthy’s novel in may ways. It begins with his willingness to leave everyone that he knew behind in the beginning of the novel, aside from his friend Rawlins. John Grady did not have a strong relationship with either of his parents, which is most likely the cause for his willingness to leave everything behind. However, there are a few ways that John Grady does not show true individualism in the novel, such as when he decides not to travel alone by bringing his friend Rawlins along for the journey. Additionally, he did not fight back much when Jimmy Blevins joined them for the ride. John Grady Cole is an interesting character in that he seems to do well on his own, similar to the Anglo-Protestant culture, but he also has a soft spot for his friends that seems to be his driving force.
The Protestant work ethic is another idea brought up by Huntington that shows similarity to John Grady Cole’s persona. His and Rawlin’s plan for their journey to Mexico was to find work as cowboys. John Grady’s willingness and ability to work at the ranch is a good example of the Protestant work ethic. This ethic is of central importance and is unique to the culture as stated by Huntington on page 71, “In other societies, heredity, class, social status, ethnicity, and family are the principal sources of status and legitimacy. In America, work is.” John Grady Cole knows a lot about horses which impresses the hacendado on the ranch allowing for his promotion while working on the ranch, as opposed to Rawlins who was stuck with their initial, lower position job. John Grady did not seem to be looking to be promoted, and even was unsure about accepting the position for fear of upsetting Rawlins, but he took it and worked hard.
Alfonsa, the great-aunt of the hacendado’s daughter, spoke with John Grady in extensive detail about the comparison of French and Spanish culture. She explains the difference in how Spanish (which also applies to Mexican) culture is very conservative and traditional, whereas French culture is radical and liberal. Anglo-Protestant culture stands somewhere in between the two, which is also where John Grady Cole falls. There are ways in which John Grady is traditional, such as his affinity for horses consistent with the American West, but he is also free-spirited considering he runs away from home and goes with the flow as he runs from law enforcement.
John Grady Cole, although distinctly individualistic, has multiple traits that align with the Anglo-Protestant culture. Examples including his individualism, his work ethic, and his mixture of tradition and progressive ideals all prove that he has similarities to the culture mentioned extensively by Samuel Huntington in addition to differences.
3 replies on “Short Essay #3”
Overall, I feel as though this short essay was well put. The structure of it was very organized; this including a strong introductory paragraph, evidence filled body paragraphs, and a firm conclusion responding to the prompt. Despite this though, I would maybe flip around some of the body paragraphs. The reason being is because ideas about the Anglo-Protestant culture are not initially presented. The initial body paragraph includes more summary than analysis, which is necessary, but incorporating little snippets of summarization in your analysis would be more fitting in my eyes. As a result of this, the short essay would be able to flow more smoothly in my opinion.
I feel that this essay was well organized and well thought out. However, I feel that in order to strengthen the argument of the paper, it is either necessary to tie religion into the piece or use a word other than ‘Anglo-Protestant’ when describing John Grady Cole. The reason I say this is because the term in itself incorporates a religious connotation. John Grady Cole, however, is not particularly religious. This could potentially debunk the argument that John Grady Cole aligns with the Anglo-Protestant Culture considering that Huntington asserts that religion is a fundamental aspect of American culture and national identity. However, I think that if you address the fact that even though John Grady Cole does not appear to be religious, but is still influenced by religious ideals and considers religion, I think this could strengthen your argument. Additionally, I think it would be effective if each paragraph ended with the idea that supports your argument. For example, in the first body paragraph, if you expressed how John Grady Cole is not individualistic and ended with how he is, I think it would flow better. Overall, however, I think this short essay is extremely well-written and clear.
This is a well structured essay, and you bring up solid points in your introduction and then expand on them throughout the essay. I liked how you brought up John Grady Cole’s individualistic nature, but also contrasted this by showing instances where he was not very individualistic. To improve the second paragraph, I think you could bring in some quotes from John Grady Cole that demonstrate his individualism or times where is isn’t being very individualistic. Overall, this is a very good essay and you link it well to points made by Huntington.